Home TOC Previous Next

Business plans for the year 2002 of UNDP, UNEP, UNIDO and the World Bank

The Thirty-fifth Meeting of the Executive Committee decided:

(a) to note the draft 2002 business plan of UNDP contained in document UNEP/OzL.Pro/ExCom/35/7 and Corr.1;

(b) to request UNDP:

(i) to take into account the comments in document UNEP/OzL.Pro/ExCom/35/7 and Corr.1 concerning planned activities in Kenya and Lebanon when finalizing its 2002 business plan;

(ii) to provide letters from countries for all activities included in its final business plan for 2002;

(iii) to indicate in its final business plan the actions it would take to expedite the implementation of approved projects and those that could be critical to compliance;

(iv) to provide a target for the performance indicator "net emissions (reductions) of ODP resulting from implementation delays (early completion)";

(v) to ensure that the projects included in its business plan were consistent with the compliance obligations of the countries involved.

(UNEP/OzL.Pro/ExCom/35/67, Decision 35/4, para. 30 (a, b)).

(Supporting document: UNEP/OzL.Pro/ExCom/35/7 and 35/7/Corr.1).

The Thirty-fifth Meeting of the Executive Committee decided:

(a) to note the draft 2002 business plan of UNEP contained in document UNEP/OzL.Pro/ExCom/35/8 and Add.1;

(b) also to note with appreciation the reorientation designed to achieve and sustain compliance, promote a greater sense of country "ownership", and implement the agreed Executive Committee framework for strategic planning;

(c) to maintain the Compliance Assistance Programme (CAP) in principle in the final business plan;

(d) to request that funds approved annually for the CAP but not spent be returned to the Multilateral Fund for re-programming at the second meeting of the Executive Committee in the year following that for which they had been approved;

(e) to agree to the completion dates for the submission of country programme/RMPs;

(f) to request UNEP to submit country programme/RMPs before requesting funding for any projects/activities contained therein, while indicating that the Executive Committee would consider requests for funding for one year of institutional strengthening for new Parties to the Protocol;

(g) also to request UNEP to provide letters from countries for all activities included in its final business plan for 2002.

(UNEP/OzL.Pro/ExCom/35/67, Decision 35/5, para. 31).

(Supporting document: UNEP/OzL.Pro/ExCom/35/8 and 35/8/Add.1).

The Thirty-fifth Meeting of the Executive Committee decided:

(a) to note the draft 2002 business plan of UNIDO contained in document UNEP/OzL.Pro/ExCom/35/9;

(b) to request UNIDO:

(i) to consider modifying its investment project performance indicator targets for ODP phase-out in 2002, cost-effectiveness, and speed of first disbursement; its non-investment performance indicator targets for speed of first disbursement; and to provide targets for the non-weighted, non-investment project performance indicators, taking into account the consideration by the Sub-Committee on Monitoring, Evaluation and Finance of the report on the performance indicators and proposal on modifications (UNEP/OzL.Pro/ExCom/35/16);

(ii) to take into account the comments in document UNEP/OzL.Pro/ExCom/35/9 concerning planned activities in Egypt, Kenya, and Oman when finalizing its 2002 business plan;

(iii) to provide letters from countries for all activities included in its final business plan for 2002;

(iv) to indicate in its final business plan the actions it would take to expedite the implementation of approved projects and those that could be critical to compliance;

(v) to ensure that the projects included for the methyl bromide sector were consistent with the Multilateral Fund’s guidelines for that sector when finalizing its 2002 business plan;

(vi) to consult with Germany on the appropriateness of including the end-user project for Kenya in its RMP supplement, noting the Executive Committee’s guidelines for additional funding for LVCs.

(UNEP/OzL.Pro/ExCom/35/67, Decision 35/6, para. 32).

(Supporting document: UNEP/OzL.Pro/ExCom/35/9).

The Thirty-fifth Meeting of the Executive Committee decided:

(a) to note the draft 2002 business plan of the World Bank contained in document UNEP/OzL.Pro/ExCom/35/10;

(b) also to note the World Bank’s efforts to expedite the implementation of approved activities and to request it to indicate in its final business plan additional actions to expedite the implementation of approved projects and those that could be critical to compliance;

(c) to request the World Bank to consider modifying its investment project performance indicator targets for phase-out in 2002, the number of countries in its business plan, and the net emissions due to delays, as well as its non-investment project performance indicators for speed of completion and reductions in ODS consumption due to non-investment projects, taking into account the consideration by the Sub-Committee on Monitoring, Evaluation and Finance of the report on the performance indicators and proposal on modifications (UNEP/OzL.Pro/ExCom/35/16);

(d) also to request the World Bank to provide more information on its expedited agreement process in the context of its final business plan, indicating the steps taken to reach agreement and the estimated time from approval to agreement for activities in countries where the Bank’s Montreal Protocol Unit had not yet established agreements, in the light of its planned activities in countries such as the Bahamas and Yemen, and in the Caribbean region;

(e) further to request the World Bank to include the non-investment activity for the development of a CTC closure project as part of its investment project allocation.

(UNEP/OzL.Pro/ExCom/35/67, Decision 35/7, para. 33).

(Supporting document: UNEP/OzL.Pro/ExCom/35/10).

The Thirty-sixth Meeting of the Executive Committee decided:

(a) to endorse the 2002 business plan of UNDP, as contained in UNEP/OzL.Pro/ExCom/36/10 and Corr.1, with the amendment in subparagraph (d) below while noting that endorsement did not denote approval of the projects identified therein nor their funding levels;

(b) to request UNEP and UNDP to redouble their efforts for the implementation of RMPs in Bangladesh and Niger;

(c) in light of its recommendation on the consolidated 2002 business plan, also to request UNDP to provide an addendum to its 2002 business plan for submission to the 37th Meeting of the Executive Committee, as appropriate, including the actions it would take to expedite the implementation of approved projects and those critical to compliance;

(d) to approve the following performance indicators for UNDP, noting that UNDP had changed its target for phase-out from non-investment activities from 120 to 160 ODP tonnes

Investment project performance indicators

ITEMS 

2002 Targets 

Weighted indicators 

 

Actual ODS phased out from completed projects (ODP tonnes) 

5,000 

Disbursement (US$) 

$38,080,000 

Satisfactory project completion reports received (percentage) 

100% 

Distribution of projects among countries in business plan (number of countries) 

31 

   

Pending decision on status as weighted or non-weighted performance indicator 

 

Timely submission of progress report 

On time 

Non-weighted indicators 

 

Number of investment projects to be completed in year of business plan 

88 

Net emissions(reductions) of ODP resulting from implementation delays(early completion) (ODP tonnes) 

14,136 

Value of Projects to be Approved in 2002(US$)* 

$37,918,025 

ODP from Projects to be Approved in 2002 

4,304 

Cost of Project Preparation 

2.7% 

Cost-effectiveness from Approvals (US$/ODP in kg) 

$7.8 

Speed of delivery (first disbursement) 

13 months 

Speed of delivery (completion) 

33 months 

*Including support costs but excluding 15% over-programming.

Non-investment performance indicators

ITEMS 

2002 Targets 

Weighted indicators 

 

Number of Projects to be Completed 

12 

Funds Disbursed (US$)* 

$3,544,975 

Speed of delivery (first disbursement) 

11 months 

Speed of delivery (completion) 

34 months 

Pending decision on status as weighted or non-weighted performance indicator 

 

Timely submission of progress report 

On time 

Non-weighted indicators 

 

Appropriate and timely policies initiated by countries as a result of non-investment activities (number) 

Reduction in ODS consumption over and above that effected by investment projects (ODP tonnes) 

160 

*Including agency fees.

(UNEP/OzL.Pro/ExCom/36/36, Decision 36/9, para. 43 (a-d)).

(Supporting document: (UNEP/OzL.Pro/ExCom/36/36, Annex II).

The Thirty-sixth Meeting of the Executive Committee decided:

(a) to endorse the 2002 business plan of UNEP, as contained in document UNEP/OzL.Pro/ExCom/36/11, while noting that, with the exception of the administrative budget to implement the CAP approved at the 35th Meeting of the Executive Committee, the endorsement did not denote approval of the projects identified in the business plan nor their funding levels;

(b) to approve the following performance indicators for UNEP;

(c) to authorize UNEP to include Eritrea in the list of countries with projects under its business plan, provided that Eritrea ratified the Montreal Protocol and sent a letter to UNEP requesting inclusion in its business plan.

Non-investment performance indicators

ITEMS 

2002 Targets 

Weighted indicators 

 

Number of Projects to be Completed 

60% of total projects approved 

Funds Disbursed (US$) 

73% of approved funding 

Speed of delivery (first disbursement) 

6 months 

Speed of delivery (completion) 

26 months 

Pending decision on status as weighted or non-weighted performance indicator 

 

Timely submission of progress report 

Timely submission 

Non-weighted indicators 

 

Appropriate and timely policies initiated by countries as a result of non-investment activities (number) 

10 countries 

Reduction in ODS consumption over and above that effected by investment projects (ODP tonnes) 

44.8 

UNEP specific non-investment performance indicators

ITEMS 

2002 Targets 

Number of newsletters 

Three 

Number of joint/regional activities which Network members are involved 

2 per region 

Improvement over previous years in data reporting and enacting the legislation and policies for ODS phase-out in Networking and institutional strengthening countries 

80 % of all Network member countries 

The extent of awareness-raising activities initiated by the countries as a result of UNEP’s publications 

Qualitative, but can be expressed in the number of brochures, awareness raising products produced by countries 

The extent to which experience achieved through UNEP’s activities is used in the adoption and adjustment of ODS phase-out strategies by Network countries 

Qualitative 

The extent to which the networks are used by the Agencies and the Secretariat in developing their work or explaining new policies 

Qualitative 

(UNEP/OzL.Pro/ExCom/36/36, Decision 36/10, para. 44).

(Supporting document: (UNEP/OzL.Pro/ExCom/36/36, Annex III).

The Thirty-sixth Meeting of the Executive Committee decided:

(a) to endorse the 2002 business plan of UNIDO, as contained in UNEP/OzL.Pro/ExCom/36/12 and Corr.1, while noting that endorsement did not denote approval of the projects identified therein nor their funding levels;

(b) in light of its recommendation on the consolidated 2002 business plan, to request UNIDO to provide an addendum to its 2002 business plan for submission to the 37th Meeting of the Executive Committee, as appropriate, including the actions it would take to expedite the implementation of approved projects and those critical to compliance;

(c) to approve the following performance indicators for UNIDO.

Investment project performance indicators

ITEMS 

2002 Targets 

Weighted indicators 

 

Actual ODS phased out from completed projects (ODP tonnes) 

2,836 

Disbursement (US$) 

$22,000,000 

Satisfactory project completion reports received (percentage) 

100% 

Distribution of projects among countries in business plan (number of countries) 

26 

Pending decision on status as weighted or non-weighted performance indicator 

 

Timely submission of progress report 

Deadline set by ExCom 

Non-weighted indicators 

 

Number of investment projects to be completed in year of business plan 

35 

Net emissions(reductions) of ODP resulting from implementation delays(early completion) (ODP tonnes) 

14,100 

Value of Projects to be Approved in 2002 (US$)* 

$30,643,000 

ODP from Projects to be Approved in 2002 

2,917 

Cost of Project Preparation 

2.8% 

Cost-effectiveness from Approvals (US$/ODP in kg) 

a) $8.68 excl. MB

b) $9.38 incl. MB 

Speed of delivery (first disbursement) 

10 months 

Speed of delivery (completion) 

36 months 

* Including support costs but excluding 15% over-programming.

Non-investment performance indicators

ITEMS 

2002 Targets 

Weighted indicators 

 

Number of Projects to be Completed 

11 

Funds Disbursed (US$)* 

$867,000 

Speed of delivery (first disbursement) 

10 months 

Speed of delivery (completion) 

24 months 

Pending decision on status as weighted or non-weighted performance indicator 

 

Timely submission of progress report 

Deadline set by ExCom 

Non-weighted indicators 

 

Appropriate & timely policies initiated by countries as a result of non-investment activities (number) 

At least one country 

Reduction in ODS consumption over and above that effected by investment projects (ODP tonnes) 

69.1 

*Including agency fees

(UNEP/OzL.Pro/ExCom/36/36, Decision 36/11, para. 45).

(Supporting document: (UNEP/OzL.Pro/ExCom/36/36, Annex IV).

The Thirty-sixth Meeting of the Executive Committee decided:

(a) to endorse the 2002 business plan of the World Bank, as contained in UNEP/OzL.Pro/ExCom/36/13 and Corr.1, while noting that endorsement did not denote approval of the projects identified therein nor their funding levels;

(b) to approve the following performance indicators for the World Bank, noting that the indicator for net emissions due to delays has been modified to 17,400 tonnes;

(c) in light of its recommendation on the consolidated 2002 business plan, to request the World Bank to provide an addendum to its 2002 business plan for submission to the 37th Meeting of the Executive Committee, as appropriate.

Investment project performance indicators

ITEMS 

2002 Targets 

Weighted indicators 

 

Actual ODS phased out from completed projects (ODP tonnes) 

8,100 

Disbursement (US$) 

$46,200,000 

Satisfactory project completion reports received (percentage) 

100% 

Distribution of projects among countries in business plan (number of countries) 

14 

Pending decision on status as weighted or non-weighted performance indicator 

 

Timely submission of progress report 

1 May 2002 or eight weeks before the subsequent ExCom 

Non-weighted indicators 

 

Number of investment projects to be completed in year of business plan 

48 

Net emissions(reductions) of ODP resulting from implementation delays(early completion) (ODP tonnes) 

17,400 

Value of Projects to be Approved in 2002(US$)* 

$56,990,000 

ODP from Projects to be Approved in 2002 

13,876 

Cost of Project Preparation 

2.54% 

Cost-effectiveness from Approvals (US$/ODP in kg) 

$3.81 

Speed of delivery (first disbursement) 

26 months 

Speed of delivery (completion) 

39 months 

* Including support costs but excluding over-programming.

Non-investment performance indicators

ITEMS 

2002 Targets 

Weighted indicators 

 

Number of Projects to be Completed 

Funds Disbursed (US$)* 

$1,450,000 

Speed of delivery (first disbursement) 

19 months 

Speed of delivery (completion) 

35 months 

Pending decision on status as weighted or non-weighted performance indicator 

 

Timely submission of progress report 

1 May 2002 or eight weeks before the subsequent ExCom 

Non-weighted indicators 

 

Appropriate & timely policies initiated by countries as a result of non-investment activities (number) 

Specific policies identified for 1 country 

Reduction in ODS consumption over and above that effected by investment projects (ODP tonnes) 

350 ODP tonnes from four on-going recovery and recycling projects 

*Includes agency fees

(UNEP/OzL.Pro/ExCom/36/36, Decision 36/12, para. 46).

(Supporting document: (UNEP/OzL.Pro/ExCom/36/36, Annex V).


Home TOC Previous Next