(Sections 1-20 to be completed by the country concerned prior to sending it to the implementing agency for comments in Section 21)
1. Country:
2. National Implementing Agency / Ozone Unit:
3. Implementing Agency:
4. List of previous project phases:
|
Phase |
Duration |
MLF Funding (approved) |
MLF funding (disbursed) |
5. Indicate the main project objective and the detailed objectives as defined in the action plan for the phase reported upon:
6. Describe the results achieved by category and compare them with the results foreseen in the Action Plan:
|
Year |
Activities |
Results expected |
Results achieved |
|
1st Year |
|||
|
2nd Year |
|||
|
Describe additional results unforeseen in the Action Plan:
|
|||
7. Breakdown of approved costs, actual expenditures and Government funding as pertinent:
|
Approved |
Spent |
Other sources |
||
|
a) Equipment component |
||||
|
b) Professional staff |
||||
|
c) Support staff |
||||
|
d) Consultants |
||||
|
e) Operational cost |
||||
|
f) Funds for public awareness |
||||
|
g) Contingency |
||||
|
Total amount |
8. Personnel Employed:
|
Category and Numbers |
Functional Titles/Expertise |
Main Tasks |
Time Period |
|
Professional Staff |
|||
|
Support Staff |
|||
|
Consultants |
|||
9. Were resources (staff, budget, equipment) used for activities in addition to the approved action plan? If so, please specify:
10. Describe the role and position of the NOU within the national administration, the way its work was supervised and its access to senior decision-makers. Give name and title of the government officer who had the overall responsibility of supervising the work of the NOU and ensured that action taken was adequate to meet the commitments under the Protocol, and include the co-operation with steering committees, advisory groups or inter-ministerial bodies as well as the government entities who dealt with import/export licensing and customs:
11. Describe how the action plan for the IS project has been integrated in the national authorities' planning process in particular, the country programme:
12. Title and date of reports submitted:
|
To Whom: |
Title of Report |
Submission (Year/Quarter) |
|
|
Planned |
Actual |
||
|
4. Implementing Agency |
|||
|
5. Other Implementing Agency(ies) |
|||
|
7. Others |
|||
13. Were adequate advice and/or technical support received from:
|
Yes |
No |
Please specify |
|
|
a) Implementing Agency |
|||
|
b) Other Implementing Agency(ies) |
|||
|
e) National Steering Committee |
|||
|
f) Others (please specify) |
14. Support received from Regional Network (Network Co-ordinator/Manager and Network members) and input provided to the Network:
|
Support received from Regional Network |
Input provided to Network |
15. Was the NOU subject to an audit by the beneficiary Government or by the Implementing Agency? If yes, what were the results?
16. Lessons learnt (what were the main successes and difficulties and what can be learnt from them for improving effectiveness and impact during the next phase):
17. Terminal Report prepared by:
|
Name and signature of Officer responsible for preparing the Terminal Report: |
|
|
Title: |
|
|
Organisation/Agency/Ministry: |
|
|
Date: |
18. Government authority with oversight responsibility for the IS project/NOU:
|
Name and signature of Officer responsible: |
|
|
Title: |
|
|
Organisation/Agency/Ministry: |
|
|
Date: |
|
|
Comments:
|
|
19. Implementing Agency:
|
Name and signature of Officer responsible: |
|
|
Title: |
|
|
Organisation/Agency/Ministry: |
|
|
Date: |
|
|
Comments:
|
|
(UNEP/OzL.Pro/ExCom/31/61, Decision 31/16, para 35).
(UNEP/OzL.Pro/ExCom/32/44, Decision 32/17, para 28).
(Supporting document: UNEP/OzL.Pro/ExCom/31/16).