Home TOC Previous Next


Criteria and rating scheme for overall assessment


(from Section II of Project Completion Report)

Part A: Assessment of Quantitative Project Performance Data

 

Category

 

Criteria

 

Range

 

Rating

 

Pre-conditions for Completion*

 

ODS phase-out as approved

 

0 or 20

 

 

Conversion completed (no more CFC in use, ODS-free production has started)

 

0 or 20

 

 

Certified equipment destruction

 

0 or 20

 

 

Delays

 

On time

 

15

 

 

6 to 12 months delay

 

0

 

More than 12 months delay

 

-15

 

Cost-effectiveness of MLF Funding

 

Better than approved by 5% or more

 

5

 

 

As approved, or better by up to 5%

 

0

 

Less cost-effective than approved

 

-5

 

Subtotal A

 

 

 

 FORMTEXT  = SUM (D3:D11) 00 FFFFFFFF002A00000000000000000E003D002000530055004D0020002800440033003A004400310031002900000001003000000000000000000000000000000000000000 >

 

Part B: Qualitative Rating of Project Performance**

 

Project Preparation

 

Quality of project design

 

5, 3 or 1

 

 

Technology Choice

 

Conversion technology

 

5, 3 or 1

 

 

Type of equipment

 

5, 3 or 1

 

 

Supplier

 

5, 3 or 1

 

 

Management of Risks

 

Safety / health protection

 

5, 3 or 1

 

 

Maintenance of equipment

 

5, 3 or 1

 

 

Maintaining product quality

 

5, 3 or 1

 

 

Preventing return to ODS use

 

5, 3 or 1

 

 

Subtotal B

 

 

 

 FORMTEXT  = SUM (D14:D21) 00 FFFFFFFF002A00000000000000000F003D002000530055004D00200028004400310034003A004400320031002900000001003000000000000000000000000000000000000000 >

 

Total Score

 

Highly satisfactory

Satisfactory

Less satisfactory

 

100 to 120

75 to 99

48 to 74

 

 FORMTEXT  = (D12) + (D22) 00 FFFFFFFF002B000000000C0072006100740069006E0067005F0074006F00740061006C0000000F003D0020002800440031003200290020002B002000280044003200320029000000010030000000000000000C0072006100740069006E0067005F0074006F00740061006C0000000000000000000000 >

 

* The overall rating will be calculated only if the pre-conditions for completion, as defined by the Executive Committee in Decision 28/2, are met and documented (applicable for projects completed after July 1999).

** Please rate the project performance with regard to quality/appropriateness using the following scale for each category: Highly satisfactory: (5); Satisfactory: (3); Less satisfactory: (1).

(UNEP/OzL.Pro/ExCom/32/44, Decision 32/18, para 29).

(Supporting document: UNEP/OzL.Pro/ExCom/32/19, Corr.1 and Add.1).


Home TOC Previous Next