The Twenty-eighth Meeting of the Executive Committee noted that there were different types of retroactive projects, depending on what proportion of the project was actually in place by the time the Implementing Agency became involved, noted that differing levels of support costs might be appropriate to those different types, and decided:
(a) to request the Implementing Agencies to provide more information on the different types of retroactive projects;
(b) to request the World Bank to give further clarification on the figure of three per cent for the financial intermediary fee at the following meeting of the Executive Committee;
(c) to request the Secretariat and the Implementing Agencies to identify the approved projects which could be classified as SMEs in accordance with the definition of SMEs provided in document UNEP/OzL.Pro/ExCom/19/54 and report on their administrative costs to the Twenty-ninth Meeting of the Executive Committee.
(UNEP/OzL.Pro/ExCom/28/57, Decision 28/49, para. 93).
The Thirty-fourth Meeting of the Executive Committee decided to request the World Bank to provide the support cost per project for all the projects approved up to the 16th Meeting by pro-rating the administrative costs approved up to that Meeting on an annual basis, while noting that any evaluation of agency support costs for the Bank would take into account the method by which support costs for the Bank were originally approved.
(UNEP/OzL.Pro/ExCom/34/58, Decision 34/4, para. 22(f)).