|
The
Executive Committee, at its Third Meeting, adopted the following guidelines for
setting priorities:
(a) projects with potential for the most
cost-effective and efficient reduction in the emission of controlled
substances;
(b) projects involving broad geographic balance;
(c) projects with ease of replication and
technology transfer to other Article 5 Parties; and
(d) projects with the highest potential reduction
of controlled substances in the shortest period of time in terms of global
impact.
(UNEP/OzL.Pro/ExCom/3/18/Rev.1 Annex III (section IV).
The
Thirteenth Meeting of the Executive Committee agreed that projects which will
result in the elimination of the maximum amount of ODS should be given priority.
It also recognized the significant problems facing the small and medium-scale
sector in several countries, and recommended that the Implementing Agencies
give special attention to the development of efficient and feasible strategies
to address their specific situation.
(UNEP/OzL.Pro/ExCom/13/47,
para. 167).
The
Executive Committee requested Article 5 Parties when submitting project
proposals prior to approval of their country programmes, to submit proposals
for priority projects consistent with the country's emerging strategy for
phasing out ozone depleting substances.
(UNEP/OzL.Pro/ExCom/10/40,
para. 135).
|