|
The Seventeenth Meeting of the
Parties decided:
1. to
encourage Parties who have deployed in the past, currently deploy or plan to
deploy technologies to recapture/recycle/destroy or reduce methyl bromide
emissions from fixed facilities or sea container fumigation applications to
submit to the Technology and Economic Assessment Panel details of efficacy,
including destruction and removal efficiency (DRE), logistical issues and the
economic feasibility of such fumigations, by 1 April 2006;
2. to
encourage Parties to report on any harmful by-products created using such
technologies;
3. to
adopt the form below for the purpose of submitting data;
4. to
include the findings of data submitted in the 2006 progress report of the
Technology and Economic Assessment Panel and summarize Parties’ positive and
negative past experiences of recovery and destruction technologies.
|
Recapture or destruction
system used: |
|
|
Location: |
|
|
Submitting body: (Provide name and
e-mail address of individual to be contacted in the event of a query) |
|
|
Commodity treated: |
|
|
Fumigation contents and volume: |
|
|
Chamber or tent volume: |
|
|
Percentage loading of chamber: |
|
|
Gas quantity retained by the
recapture or destruction system: |
|
|
Quantity lost during the
fumigation by leakage or reaction: |
|
|
Residual free gas left in the
enclosure after extraction of methyl bromide into the recapture system: |
|
|
Remaining sorbed gas (taking into
account any gas naturally present prior to fumigation): |
|
|
Quantity of methyl bromide
transiting the recapture/destruction system and lost by leaks in the system: |
|
|
Measurement of gas exhausted after
recapture stopped: |
|
|
Total gas present in the fumigated
system at start of recapture: |
|
|
Net efficiency of recapture: |
|
|
Cost per kg recaptured/destroyed
(US$): |
|
(UNEP/OzL.Pro.17/11,
Decision XVII/11).
|