1. List of plants in the country
|
Name |
Location |
Product
List |
Nominal
Capacity |
Date
of Construction |
Name
of Proprietors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Effective production of ODS substances
country-wide
|
Tonnes/Year |
||||||
|
|
CFC-11 |
CFC-12 |
CFC-113 |
Others* |
Halon
1211 |
Halon
1301 |
|
1993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1996
(est.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
To be specified.
3. Effective production of ODS substances plant
by plant
Data for a plant “X” (one table for one
plant**)
|
Tonnes/Year |
||||||
|
|
CFC-11 |
CFC-12 |
CFC-113 |
Others* |
Halon
1211 |
Halon
1301 |
|
1993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1996
(est.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
To be specified.
**
If it is a swing plant, please specify.
3.1 Industry turn over as % of GNP
as % of
Chemical industries
3.2 Quantities of exported CFCs (Optional)
|
Tonnes/Year |
||||||
|
|
CFC-11 |
CFC-12 |
CFC-113 |
Others* |
Halon
1211 |
Halon
1301 |
|
1993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1996
(est.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
To be specified.
4. Total employees in the CFC industry
a) In
the production sector (Direct labour + overheads + maintenance).
b) In
the packaging sectors
4.1 Total employees per CFC plant (one table per
plant)
|
Number
of employees in the plant “...XY...” |
|||||
|
|
Direct
labour |
Overhead |
Labs |
Maintenance |
Packaging |
|
1993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1996
(est.) |
|
|
|
|
|
FORM FOR THE SECTOR PHASE-OUT PLAN
1. Strategy for phase-out
a) Time schedule for the phase-out
|
Name
of the plant |
Proposed
date of shut down |
Name
& Quantities of CFC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b) Proposal of an action plan for phase-out
regarding sites
c) Strategy and action plan regarding manpower
2. Strategy for production of new substitutes
|
Substitutes
with zero ozone depletion potential: HFCs (including HFC-134a), Hydrocarbons,
etc. Technology
and time schedule (2000/2020) |
|||||
|
Location
of the plant |
Proposed
date of start up |
Name
and quantities of substitutes |
ÿsÿaÿ ÿtÿlÿ=ÿfÿnÿ-ÿiÿeÿ1ÿ.ÿpÿ;ÿoÿtÿfÿmÿlÿ:ÿTÿmÿsÿNÿwÿRÿmÿnÿ'ÿSÿaÿuÿ
ÿ ÿoÿ ÿeÿhÿoÿoÿyÿoÿpÿ<ÿoÿpÿ<ÿsÿaÿ>ÿ/ÿoÿtÿ<ÿpÿ
ÿ ÿ<ÿtÿ>ÿ
ÿ ÿtÿ ÿiÿtÿ=ÿ6ÿvÿlÿgÿ=ÿoÿ ÿtÿlÿ=ÿwÿdÿhÿ1ÿ0ÿnÿbÿrÿeÿ-ÿoÿ:ÿoÿeÿbÿrÿeÿ-ÿeÿtÿnÿnÿ;ÿ
ÿ ÿoÿdÿrÿbÿtÿoÿ:ÿoÿiÿ ÿiÿdÿwÿeÿtÿ1ÿ0ÿtÿbÿrÿeÿ-ÿiÿhÿ:ÿoÿiÿ ÿiÿdÿwÿeÿtÿ1ÿ0ÿtÿ
ÿ ÿmÿoÿbÿrÿeÿ-ÿoÿ-ÿlÿ:ÿoÿiÿ ÿiÿdÿwÿeÿtÿ.ÿ5ÿtÿmÿoÿbÿrÿeÿ-ÿeÿtÿaÿtÿsÿlÿdÿwÿnÿoÿtÿxÿ ÿ7ÿpÿ;ÿ
ÿ ÿsÿ-ÿoÿdÿrÿaÿtÿsÿlÿdÿwÿnÿoÿtÿxÿ ÿ7ÿpÿ;ÿaÿdÿnÿ:ÿiÿ ÿ.ÿpÿ ÿiÿ ÿ.ÿpÿ'ÿ
ÿ ÿ<ÿ ÿlÿsÿ=ÿsÿNÿrÿaÿ ÿtÿlÿ=ÿtÿbÿsÿoÿsÿ.ÿ5ÿnÿ.ÿiÿ ÿ7ÿiÿ ÿ.ÿiÿ'ÿ<ÿoÿtÿsÿzÿ=ÿ
ÿ ÿfÿcÿ=ÿTÿmÿsÿNÿwÿRÿmÿnÿ>ÿsÿaÿ ÿtÿlÿ=ÿfÿnÿ-ÿiÿeÿ1ÿ.ÿpÿ;ÿoÿtÿfÿmÿlÿ:ÿTÿmÿsÿNÿwÿRÿmÿnÿ'ÿSÿaÿuÿ
ÿ ÿoÿ ÿhÿ ÿlÿnÿ ÿ<ÿ:ÿ>ÿ/ÿ:ÿ>ÿ/ÿpÿnÿ<ÿfÿnÿ>ÿ/ÿ>ÿ
ÿ ÿ/ÿdÿ
ÿ ÿ<ÿdÿwÿdÿhÿ1ÿ2ÿvÿlÿgÿ=ÿoÿ ÿtÿlÿ=ÿwÿdÿhÿ7ÿ.ÿpÿ;ÿoÿdÿrÿtÿpÿnÿnÿ;ÿoÿdÿrÿlÿfÿ:ÿ
ÿ ÿoÿeÿbÿrÿeÿ-ÿoÿtÿmÿsÿlÿdÿwÿnÿoÿtÿxÿ ÿ.ÿpÿ;ÿoÿdÿrÿrÿgÿtÿsÿlÿdÿwÿnÿoÿtÿxÿ ÿ.ÿpÿ;ÿ
ÿ ÿsÿ-ÿoÿdÿrÿtÿpÿaÿtÿsÿlÿdÿwÿnÿoÿtÿxÿ ÿ7ÿpÿ;ÿsÿ-ÿoÿdÿrÿlÿfÿ-ÿlÿ:ÿoÿiÿ ÿiÿdÿwÿeÿtÿ.ÿ5ÿtÿ
ÿ ÿmÿoÿbÿrÿeÿ-ÿlÿ:ÿoÿiÿ ÿiÿdÿwÿeÿtÿ.ÿ5ÿtÿpÿdÿiÿgÿ0ÿnÿ5ÿ4ÿtÿ0ÿnÿ5ÿ4ÿtÿ>ÿ
ÿ ÿpÿcÿaÿsÿMÿoÿoÿmÿlÿsÿyÿeÿ'ÿaÿ-ÿtÿpÿ:ÿ2ÿiÿ ÿ5ÿnÿ.ÿ5ÿnÿ1ÿ0ÿnÿ>ÿfÿnÿ ÿiÿeÿ2ÿ
ÿ ÿaÿeÿ"ÿiÿeÿ ÿeÿ ÿoÿaÿ"ÿ<ÿpÿnÿsÿyÿeÿ'ÿoÿtÿsÿzÿ:ÿ0ÿ5ÿtÿfÿnÿ-ÿaÿiÿyÿ"ÿiÿeÿ ÿeÿ ÿoÿaÿ"ÿ>ÿvÿiÿaÿiÿiÿyÿ
ÿ ÿfÿrÿwÿmÿtÿrÿaÿsÿoÿpÿ<ÿoÿpÿ<ÿsÿaÿ>ÿ/ÿoÿtÿ<ÿpÿ
ÿ ÿ<ÿtÿ>ÿ
ÿ<ÿtÿ>ÿ
ÿ<ÿrÿsÿyÿeÿ'ÿsÿ-ÿfÿiÿiÿoÿ:ÿ'ÿ
ÿ ÿ<ÿdÿwÿdÿhÿ9ÿ ÿaÿiÿnÿtÿpÿsÿyÿeÿ'ÿiÿtÿ:ÿ7ÿ5ÿtÿbÿrÿeÿ:ÿoÿiÿ ÿiÿdÿwÿeÿtÿ1ÿ0ÿtÿ
ÿ ÿbÿrÿeÿ-ÿoÿ:ÿoÿeÿmÿoÿbÿrÿeÿ-ÿoÿ-ÿlÿ:ÿoÿiÿ ÿiÿdÿwÿeÿtÿ.ÿ5ÿtÿmÿoÿbÿrÿeÿ-ÿlÿ:ÿ
ÿ ÿoÿiÿ ÿiÿdÿwÿeÿtÿ.ÿ5ÿtÿpÿdÿiÿgÿ0ÿnÿ5ÿ4ÿtÿ0ÿnÿ5ÿ4ÿtÿ>ÿ
ÿ ÿpÿcÿaÿsÿMÿoÿoÿmÿlÿsÿyÿeÿ'ÿaÿ-ÿtÿpÿ:ÿ2ÿiÿ ÿ5ÿnÿ.ÿ5ÿnÿ1ÿ0ÿnÿ>ÿfÿnÿ ÿiÿeÿ2ÿ
ÿ ÿaÿeÿ"ÿiÿeÿ ÿeÿ ÿoÿaÿ"ÿ<ÿpÿnÿsÿyÿeÿ'ÿoÿtÿsÿzÿ:ÿ0ÿ5ÿtÿfÿnÿ-ÿaÿiÿyÿ"ÿiÿeÿ ÿeÿ ÿoÿaÿ"ÿ>ÿoÿpÿ&ÿbÿpÿ<ÿoÿpÿ<ÿsÿaÿ>ÿ/ÿoÿtÿ<ÿpÿ
ÿ ÿ<ÿtÿ>ÿ
ÿ ÿtÿ ÿiÿtÿ=ÿ0ÿ ÿaÿiÿnÿtÿpÿsÿyÿeÿ'ÿiÿtÿ:ÿ6ÿ5ÿtÿbÿrÿeÿ-ÿoÿ:ÿoÿeÿbÿrÿeÿ-ÿeÿtÿ
ÿ ÿnÿnÿ;ÿoÿdÿrÿbÿtÿoÿ:ÿoÿiÿ ÿiÿdÿwÿeÿtÿ1ÿ0ÿtÿbÿrÿeÿ-ÿiÿhÿ:ÿoÿiÿ ÿiÿdÿwÿeÿtÿ1ÿ0ÿtÿ
ÿ ÿmÿoÿbÿrÿeÿ-ÿoÿ-ÿlÿ:ÿoÿiÿ ÿiÿdÿwÿeÿtÿ.ÿ5ÿtÿmÿoÿbÿrÿeÿ-ÿeÿtÿaÿtÿsÿlÿdÿwÿnÿoÿtÿxÿ ÿ7ÿpÿ;ÿ
ÿ ÿsÿ-ÿoÿdÿrÿaÿtÿsÿlÿdÿwÿnÿoÿtÿxÿ ÿ7ÿpÿ;ÿaÿdÿnÿ:ÿiÿ ÿ.ÿpÿ ÿiÿ ÿ.ÿpÿ'ÿ
ÿ ÿ<ÿ ÿlÿsÿ=ÿsÿNÿrÿaÿ ÿtÿlÿ=ÿtÿbÿsÿoÿsÿ.ÿ5ÿnÿ.ÿiÿ ÿ7ÿiÿ ÿ.ÿiÿ'ÿ<ÿoÿtÿsÿzÿ=ÿ
ÿ ÿfÿcÿ=ÿTÿmÿsÿNÿwÿRÿmÿnÿ>ÿsÿaÿ ÿtÿlÿ=ÿfÿnÿ-ÿiÿeÿ1ÿ.ÿpÿ;ÿoÿtÿfÿmÿlÿ:ÿTÿmÿsÿNÿwÿRÿmÿnÿ'ÿ<ÿ:ÿ>ÿnÿsÿ;ÿ/ÿ:ÿ>ÿ/ÿpÿnÿ<ÿfÿnÿ>ÿ/ÿ>ÿ
ÿ ÿ/ÿdÿ
ÿ ÿ<ÿdÿwÿdÿhÿ1ÿ2ÿvÿlÿgÿ=ÿoÿ ÿtÿlÿ=ÿwÿdÿhÿ7ÿ.ÿpÿ;ÿoÿdÿrÿtÿpÿnÿnÿ;ÿoÿdÿrÿlÿfÿ:ÿ
ÿ ÿoÿeÿbÿrÿeÿ-ÿoÿtÿmÿsÿlÿdÿwÿnÿoÿtÿxÿ ÿ.ÿpÿ;ÿoÿdÿrÿrÿgÿtÿsÿlÿdÿwÿnÿoÿtÿxÿ ÿ.ÿpÿ;ÿ
ÿ ÿsÿ-ÿoÿdÿrÿtÿpÿaÿtÿsÿlÿdÿwÿnÿoÿtÿxÿ ÿ7ÿpÿ;ÿsÿ-ÿoÿdÿrÿlÿfÿ-ÿlÿ:ÿoÿiÿ ÿiÿdÿwÿeÿtÿ.ÿ5ÿtÿ
ÿ ÿmÿoÿbÿrÿeÿ-ÿlÿ:ÿoÿiÿ ÿiÿdÿwÿeÿtÿ.ÿ5ÿtÿpÿdÿiÿgÿ0ÿnÿ5ÿ4ÿtÿ0ÿnÿ5ÿ4ÿtÿ>ÿ
ÿ ÿpÿcÿaÿsÿMÿoÿoÿmÿlÿsÿyÿeÿ'ÿaÿ-ÿtÿpÿ:ÿ2ÿiÿ ÿ5ÿnÿ.ÿ5ÿnÿ1ÿ0ÿnÿ>ÿfÿnÿ ÿiÿeÿ2ÿ
ÿ ÿaÿeÿ"ÿiÿeÿ ÿeÿ ÿoÿaÿ"ÿ<ÿpÿnÿsÿyÿeÿ'ÿoÿtÿsÿzÿ:ÿ0ÿ5ÿtÿfÿnÿ-ÿaÿiÿyÿ"ÿiÿeÿ ÿeÿ ÿoÿaÿ"ÿ>ÿoÿpÿ&ÿbÿpÿ<ÿoÿpÿ<ÿsÿaÿ>ÿ/ÿoÿtÿ<ÿpÿ
ÿ ÿ<ÿtÿ>ÿ
ÿ ÿtÿ ÿiÿtÿ=ÿ0ÿ ÿaÿiÿnÿtÿpÿsÿyÿeÿ'ÿiÿtÿ:ÿ6ÿ5ÿtÿbÿrÿeÿ-ÿoÿ:ÿoÿeÿbÿrÿeÿ-ÿeÿtÿ
ÿ ÿnÿnÿ;ÿoÿdÿrÿbÿtÿoÿ:ÿoÿiÿ ÿiÿdÿwÿeÿtÿ1ÿ0ÿtÿbÿrÿeÿ-ÿiÿhÿ:ÿoÿiÿ ÿiÿdÿwÿeÿtÿ1ÿ0ÿtÿ
ÿ ÿmÿoÿbÿrÿeÿ-ÿoÿ-ÿlÿ:ÿoÿiÿ ÿiÿdÿwÿeÿtÿ.ÿ5ÿtÿmÿoÿbÿrÿeÿ-ÿeÿtÿaÿtÿsÿlÿdÿwÿnÿoÿtÿxÿ ÿ7ÿpÿ;ÿ
ÿ ÿsÿ-ÿoÿdÿrÿaÿtÿsÿlÿdÿwÿnÿoÿtÿxÿ ÿ7ÿpÿ;ÿaÿdÿnÿ:ÿiÿ ÿ.ÿpÿ ÿiÿ ÿ.ÿpÿ'ÿ
ÿ ÿ<ÿ ÿlÿsÿ=ÿsÿNÿrÿaÿ ÿtÿlÿ=ÿtÿbÿsÿoÿsÿ.ÿ5ÿnÿ.ÿiÿ ÿ7ÿiÿ ÿ.ÿiÿ'ÿ<ÿoÿtÿsÿzÿ=ÿ
ÿ ÿfÿcÿ=ÿTÿmÿsÿNÿwÿRÿmÿnÿ>ÿsÿaÿ ÿtÿlÿ=ÿfÿnÿ-ÿiÿeÿ1ÿ.ÿpÿ;ÿoÿtÿfÿmÿlÿ:ÿTÿmÿsÿNÿwÿRÿmÿnÿ'ÿ<ÿ:ÿ>ÿnÿsÿ;ÿ/ÿ:ÿ>ÿ/ÿpÿnÿ<ÿfÿnÿ>ÿ/ÿ>ÿ
ÿ ÿ/ÿdÿ
ÿ ÿ<ÿdÿwÿdÿhÿ9ÿ ÿaÿiÿnÿtÿpÿsÿyÿeÿ'ÿiÿtÿ:ÿ.ÿiÿ;ÿoÿdÿrÿtÿpÿnÿnÿ;ÿoÿdÿrÿlÿfÿ:ÿoÿeÿ
ÿ ÿbÿrÿeÿ-ÿoÿtÿmÿsÿlÿdÿwÿnÿoÿtÿxÿ ÿ.ÿpÿ;ÿoÿdÿrÿrÿgÿtÿsÿlÿdÿwÿnÿoÿtÿxÿ ÿ.ÿpÿ;ÿ
ÿ ÿsÿ-ÿoÿdÿrÿtÿpÿaÿtÿsÿlÿdÿwÿnÿoÿtÿxÿ ÿ7ÿpÿ;ÿsÿ-ÿoÿdÿrÿlÿfÿ-ÿlÿ:ÿoÿiÿ ÿiÿdÿwÿeÿtÿ.ÿ5ÿtÿ
ÿ ÿmÿoÿbÿrÿeÿ-ÿlÿ:ÿoÿiÿ ÿiÿdÿwÿeÿtÿ.ÿ5ÿtÿpÿdÿiÿgÿ0ÿnÿ5ÿ4ÿtÿ0ÿnÿ5ÿ4ÿtÿ>ÿ
ÿ ÿpÿcÿaÿsÿMÿoÿoÿmÿlÿsÿyÿeÿ'ÿaÿ-ÿtÿpÿ:ÿ2ÿiÿ ÿ5ÿnÿ.ÿ5ÿnÿ1ÿ0ÿnÿ>ÿfÿnÿ ÿiÿeÿ2ÿ
ÿ ÿaÿeÿ"ÿiÿeÿ ÿeÿ ÿoÿaÿ"ÿ<ÿpÿnÿsÿyÿeÿ'ÿoÿtÿsÿzÿ:ÿ0ÿ5ÿtÿfÿnÿ-ÿaÿiÿyÿ"ÿiÿeÿ ÿeÿ ÿoÿaÿ"'> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
New equipment or revamping of the existing plant.
|
Transitional
substances (including HCFC-22, 123a, 141b, 142b, etc.). Technology
and time schedule (2000/2020) |
|||||
|
Location
of the plant |
Proposed
date of start up |
Name
and quantities of substitutes |
Status
of technology |
Status
of the plant * |
Availability
of raw materials |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
New equipment or revamping of the existing plant.
3. General Comments
TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE TECHNICAL AUDIT
Purposes of the Field Audit
While
the overall objective of the audit process is to provide all the data needed to
review sectoral plans, this information will, of course, be plan specific and will
further depend on decisions of the Executive Committee regarding compensation
for lost profit and on funding of new production capacity. One can, however,
visualize that, although preparation and initial analysis can be carried out
anywhere, by such means as distribution of questionnaires, meetings with ODS
production sector representatives, etc., obtaining certain information to
complete the analysis will require a Field Audit. Broadly, there are three
purposes to the Field Audit:
1) establish utilized (audited) present
operating yearly capacity and potential capacity of individual plants and total
country production capacity;
2) determine production history of individual
plants and total country production history; and
3) other relevant technical/commercial
information on country and market underlying the sectoral plan which is
conveniently gathered in the Field.
Function and Responsibilities of Field Audit Team(s).
Modality
of Operation - operate country-by-country, as invited,
Reporting
- to the Chief Officer of the Multilateral Fund with input and advice from the
Expert Group; and
Composition
- Total of at least three with overlapping skills in fluorine technology,
process/project/operations, estimating/economics; in addition, a representative
from the Expert Group and local expert, as needed.
Issues to be addressed by field audit team
Capacity
1) Assess
ability of each site to produce ODS under sustainable conditions, i.e. for a
full year, including environmental impact;
2) For
CFCs, assess potential for conversion of each site to HCFC or HFC production1;
3
Assess site and national
availability and cost of chlorocarbons and HF, i.e. size and location of
plants.
4
Production History and
Profitability
5) Assess
production history based on site production and storage records and from
local/national sales records, including imports-exports; and
6) Collect
site cost/profitability data, including cost of labour, number of workers,
selling price of products, taxes and subsidies, if any.
7) Other
relevant information
8) Collect
data from national plan on project supply and demand for ODS and ODS
substitutes, HF and chlorocarbons;
9) Analyze
transport costs for raw materials and products; and
10) Evaluate
status and availability of national technology for ODS substitutes, together
with their estimated production costs and possible scale of production over the
next five years.
Analysis of Field Data and Completion of Audit (by Expert
Group, subgroup thereof or consultants).
This
builds on the information from the Field Audit teams to create the framework to
review sectoral plans. Some tasks may be plan specific, and technical
information beyond that garnered in the Field Audit may be required, but
typical issues include:
Evaluate
ODS production economics for main and/or typical sites, including
distribution/transportation costs;
Compare
production data to other sources;
Compare
production data to results of “capacity audit”;
Evaluate
conversion costs, for applicable sites, to HCFC and HFC production, and the
resulting production economics and achievable capacities;
Demand
estimate based on Country Programmes and downstream projects;
Evaluate
sectoral plan data for level of detail needed for costing;
Assess
technical feasibility of sectoral plans, reflecting all results of the audit;
and
Cost
sectoral plans.
Cost and Duration
Cost
and duration of a Field Audit will be country specific, depending on the number
of sites to be visited. These will typically include the principal production
centres as well as repositories of national data, and potentially one or more
research centres.
Once
the number of sites to be visited is fixed, it becomes possible to estimate the
duration of the Field Audit. Given the need for access to key people, etc., it
is conceivable that a Field Audit may comprise more than one mission. The
duration is converted to a cost by multiplying by the Team size and the cost
per manday.
Cost
of analysis of the data and completion of the audit will also be plan specific,
but will certainly involve at a minimum several man-weeks of work. It is to be
noted also that information on new plant economics and future price projections
will be needed and will have to be developed or acquired at additional cost.