Home|TOC|Index|Previous|Next  

Guidelines for the preparation of HCFC phase-out management plans incorporating HCFC surveys

The Fifty-fourth Meeting of the Executive Committee decided to adopt the following guidelines:

(a)  countries should adopt a staged approach to the implementation of an HCFC phase-out management plan (HPMP), within the framework of their over arching strategy;

(b)  as soon as possible and depending on the availability of resources, countries should employ the guidelines herein to develop, in detail, stage one of the HPMPs, which would address how countries would meet the freeze in 2013 and the 10 per cent reduction in 2015, with an estimate of related cost considerations and applying cost guidelines as they were developed;

(c)  the elaboration of stage one of the HPMP and subsequent stages should be developed as follows:

      (i)   for countries with consumption in the servicing sector only:

            a.   to be consistent with existing guidelines for the preparation of RMPs/RMP updates pursuant to decisions 31/48 and 35/57; and, if applicable, with the preparation of TPMPs pursuant to decision 45/54;

            b.   to contain commitments to achieve the 2013 and 2015 HCFC control measures and include a performance-based system for HPMPs based on the completion of activities in the HPMP to enable the annual release of funding for the HPMP;

      (ii)  for countries with manufacturing sectors using HCFCs, HPMPs should contain a national performance-based phase-out plan (NPP) with one or several substance or sector-based phase-out plans (SPP) consistent with decision 38/65 addressing consumption reduction levels sufficient to achieve the 2013 and 2015 HCFC control measures and provide starting points for aggregate reductions, together with annual reduction targets;

(d)  for countries that chose to implement investment projects in advance of completion of the HPMP:

      (i)   the approval of each project should result in a phase-out of HCFCs to count against the consumption identified in the HPMP and no such projects could be approved after 2010 unless they were part of the HPMP;

      (ii)  if the individual project approach was used, the submission of the first project should provide an indication of how the demonstration projects related to the HPMP and an indication of when the HPMP would be submitted;

(e)  consideration should be given to providing funding for assistance to include HCFC control measures in legislation, regulations and licensing systems as part of the funding of HPMP preparation as necessary and confirmation of the implementation of the same should be required as a prerequisite for funding implementation of the HPMP;

(f)   in cases where there were multiple implementing agencies in one country, a lead agency should be designated to coordinate the overall development of stage one of the HPMP;

(g)  HPMPs should contain cost information at the time of their submission based on and addressing:

      (i)   the most current HCFC cost guidelines at the time of submission;

      (ii)  alternative cost scenarios based on different potential cut-off dates for new capacity if a specific cut-off date had not yet been decided, for funding eligibility of manufacturing facilities as specified in decision 53/37(k), as well as the current policy for a 25 July 1995 cut-off date;

      (iii) alternative cost scenarios for the operational and capital costs for second conversions;

      (iv) the incremental costs of regulating import and supply to the market of HCFC dependent equipment once proven alternatives were commercially available in the country and describing the benefits to the servicing sector of associated reduced demand;

      (v)  cost and benefit information based on the full range of alternatives considered, and associated ODP and other impacts on the environment including on the climate, taking into account global-warming potential, energy use and other relevant factors;

(h)  countries and agencies were encouraged to explore potential financial incentives and opportunities for additional resources to maximize the environmental benefits from HPMPs pursuant to paragraph 11(b) of decision XIX/6 of the Nineteenth Meeting of the Parties;

(i)   HPMPs should address:

      (i)   the use of institutional arrangements mentioned in decision 53/37(e) and (f);

      (ii)  the roles and responsibilities of associations of refrigeration technicians and other industry associations and how they could contribute to HCFC phase-out; and

(j)   HPMPs should, as a minimum, fulfil the data and information requirements, as applicable, listed in the indicative outline for the development of HPMPs, as set out in Annex XIX to the present report.

(UNEP/OzL.Pro/ExCom/54/59, Decision 54/39, para.170).

(Supporting document: UNEP/OzL.Pro/ExCom/54/53).


  Home|TOC|Index|Previous|Next