|
SECTION 1: PROJECT OVERVIEW
|
1.1 |
Country: |
|
|
|
1.2 |
Project number (as per Inventory): |
Project number |
|
|
1.3 |
Project title |
|
|
|
1.4 |
Address(es) of enterprise and project site(s): |
|
|
|
1.5 |
Date of approval of the project (as per Inventory): |
|
|
|
|
|
Approved |
Actual |
|
1.6 |
Date of completion: |
Original: |
|
|
Latest revised: |
|||
|
1.7 |
Conversion/alternative technology used1: |
From: To: other |
To: |
|
From: To: other |
To: |
||
|
From (other): To (other) |
To (other): |
||
|
1.8 |
ODP phase-out: |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
1.9 |
Total MLF funding: |
$ 0 |
$ 0 |
|
1.10 |
Total counterpart funding (as per project document): |
$ 0 |
$ 0 |
|
1.11 |
Total project cost: |
$ 0 |
$ 0 |
|
1.12 |
Cost-effectiveness: |
|
|
|
1.13 |
Percentage of Article 5 country ownership: |
0.0 % |
0.0 % |
|
1.14 |
Percentage of exports to non-Article 5 countries: |
0.0 % |
0.0 % |
|
|
Discussion held with: |
Agency |
Name/date |
|
1.15 |
Implementing agency: |
|
|
|
1.16 |
Executing agency/financial intermediary: |
|
|
|
1.17 |
National coordinating agency/NOU: |
|
|
|
1.18 |
Beneficiary company |
|
|
|
If the actual technology used is
different from the approved one, indicate procedures followed with regard to
informing the executive committee and seeking approval in accordance with the
guidelines established by decision 22/70: Other explanations, if
needed: |
|||
*Indicate whether this report is
provisional or final .
SECTION 2: Criteria and Rating Scheme for Overall assessment
|
Part A: Assessment of Quantitative Project Performance Data |
||
|
|
Criteria |
Rating |
|
Pre-conditions for completion* |
ODS phase-out as approved Conversion completed (no more CFC in use, ODS-free production has
started). Certified equipment destruction |
20 20 20 |
|
Delays |
On time 6 to 12 months delay More than 12 months delay |
15 0 -15 |
|
Cost-effectiveness of MLF funding |
Cost-effectiveness more than 5% better than approved Cost-effectiveness as approved or less than 5% better Cost-effectiveness less than approved |
5 0 -5 |
|
Sub-total A |
|
|
|
Part B: Qualitative Rating of Project Performance** |
||
|
Project Preparation |
Quality of project design |
5,3or1 |
|
Technology choice |
Conversion technology Type of equipment Supplier |
5,3or1 5,3or1 5,3or1 |
|
Management of risks |
Safety / health protection Maintenance of equipment Maintaining product quality Preventing return to ODS use |
5,3or1 5,3or1 5,3or1 5,3or1 |
|
Sub-total B |
|
|
|
Total score |
Highly satisfactory: 100 to
120 Satisfactory: 75 to 99 Less satisfactory: 48 to 74 |
|
*The overall rating will be
calculated only if the pre-conditions for completion as defined by the
Executive Committee in Decision 28/2 are met and
documented (applicable for projects completed after July 1999).
**Please rate the project
performance with regard to quality/appropriateness using the following scale
for each category: Highly satisfactory: (5); Satisfactory: (3); Less
satisfactory: (1).
SECTION 3:
DESCRIPTIVE ASSESSMENT OF PROJECT PERFORMANCE
The following questions are to summarize actual
performance as compared to what was approved in the project document.
3.1 Comments on ODS phase-out
approved and achieved (explain differences, report on remaining consumption of
ODS and the risk of the beneficiary returning to the use of ODS):
3.2 Explain reasons if conversion
technology was changed after approval (in cases other than approved by the
Executive Committee):
3.3 Describe any major (technical,
financial, political or other) problems encountered in project preparation,
causes of delays and actions taken to overcome them:
3.4 Describe main post-conversion
safety and environmental risks and measures taken to cope with them; attach
copies of appropriate certificates:
3.5 Report on implementation of
Executive Committee approval conditions (in cases of approval with specified
conditions):
3.6 Comments on differences between
approved and actual figures for capital, operational and contingency costs and
actions taken to cope with cost overruns:
3.7 Report on reasons for changes
in counterpart funding for eligible incremental costs:
3.8 Categorize and describe causes of
implementation delays and actions taken to overcome them:
|
Categories |
Causes of Delay |
Actions taken to Overcome
Delay(s) |
|
a) due to Implementing Agency delays |
|
|
|
b) due to enterprise delays |
|
|
|
c) due to equipment / chemical supplier delays |
|
|
|
d) due to Governmental delays |
|
|
|
e) due to external (regional/global) factors |
|
|
|
f) due to delays in funding following project
approval |
|
|
3.9 Provide an overall assessment of the fate of the baseline equipment
(refer to Section 7):
3.10 Lessons learned for future action:
3.11 Comments of the
beneficiary enterprise:
3.12 Government's / NOU's comments:
SECTION 4: ODS PHASE-OUT
Pre-conversion (as reported in
project document).
4.1 Products manufactured/services provided:
4.2 Annual level of production /
services:
4.3 ODS consumed in baseline year:
|
Substance |
Amount in tonnes |
ODP of the substance |
Total ODP tonnes |
|
ODS (1) |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
ODS (2) |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
ODS (3) |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
ODS (4) |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
Total: |
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
Explanations, if needed: |
|||
4.4 Project Preparation
|
Budget Approved: |
$ 0 |
|
Actual Expenditures: |
$ 0 |
|
Describe briefly the role of the enterprise in
project preparation: |
|
|
In what way was the NOU involved in project
preparation: |
|
|
Were any changes made as a consequence of the
external technical review? If yes, please specify: |
|
|
Did the ExCom approve the project in its original
version? If not, please specify: |
|
|
Explanations, if needed: |
|
Transition from ODS-based to
non-ODS-based production/services
4.5 Evolution of the amount of ODS consumed
|
Schedule |
Actual Year |
Units produced/ serviced using ODS |
Amount of ODS consumed (Tonnes) |
|||
|
ODS(1) |
ODS(2) |
ODS(3) |
ODS(4) |
|||
|
199X* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
199X** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
199X+1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
199X+2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
199X+3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
199Y*** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200Y+1**** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Explanations, if needed: |
||||||
4.6 Evolution
of the amount of substitutes consumed
|
Schedule |
Actual Year |
Units produced/ serviced using substitutes |
Amount of substitutes consumed (Tonnes) |
|||
|
SUB(1) |
SUB(2) |
SUB(3) |
SUB(4) |
|||
|
199X* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
199X** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
199X+1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
199X+2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
199X+3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
199Y*** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200Y+1**** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Explanations, if needed: |
||||||
*Baseline year (per project document).
**Year of project approval. Please adjust accordingly if baseline year =
approval year
***Year of successful commencement of new projection.
****Most recent year.
Post-conversion
4.7 Amount
of substitutes consumed in final year of report, and remaining Ozone Depleting
Potential
|
Substitute |
Amount in Tonnes |
ODP of the Substitute |
Total ODP Tonnes |
|
SUB (1) |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
SUB (2) |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
SUB (3) |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
SUB (4) |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
Total: |
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
Explanations, if needed: |
|||
SECTION 5: BUDGET AND
EXPENDITURES
In case this PCR is still
provisional (as indicated in Section 1), this may serve as a status report on
project expenditures at the time of preparing the Project Completion Report
with the understanding that a full financial completion report will be prepared
as a supplement once the accounts of the project are closed.
5.1 Total budget and expenditure on incremental
cost:
|
Project budget |
Approved
costs |
Actual
total costs |
Actual
total funding disbursed |
|
|
|
|
|
Grant funds |
Counterpart funds |
|
Incremental capital costs |
$ 0 |
$ 0 |
$ 0 |
$ 0 |
|
Contingency |
$ 0 |
|
$ 0 |
|
|
IOC* |
$ 0 |
$ 0 |
$ 0 |
$ 0 |
|
Total |
$ 0 |
$ 0 |
$ 0 |
$ 0 |
|
Total MLF grant** |
$ 0 |
|
|
|
|
Total MLF grant not utilized |
$ 0 |
|
|
|
|
Indicate date(s) and amount(s) of IOC disbursement(s)
by Implementing Agency: Other explanations, if
needed: |
||||
*If IOC funds were used to finance incremental capital costs,
in accordance with ExCom Decision 20/6, the amount
should be specified in Section 3.6 above.
**Differences between total approved
costs and total MLF grant may be due to non-Art. 5 country ownership and/or
exports to Art. 2 countries (see Sections 1.11 and 1.12 above).
5.2 Detailed list of incremental capital cost and contingency by item:
|
Project budget |
Approved costs |
Actual costs |
Actual funding |
|
|
|
|
|
Grant funds |
Counterpart funds |
|
Incremental capital costs* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
|
|
|
Contingency |
|
|
|
|
|
Explanations, if needed: |
||||
*List of equipment
capital cost, including cost for international consultants by item as approved
in project document (additional equipment should be indicated). If the company
insists on purchasing equipment for more than the limits established through
international bidding please provide detailed explanation in Section 3.6.
5.3 Incremental Operating Costs by Item and
Disbursement(s)
|
|
As per project document approved |
Based on information from company |
|
|
Cost Items |
Before |
After |
Actual |
|
CFC/ODS prices US$/kg (per substance) |
$ 0.00 |
|
|
|
Substitute prices US$/kg (per substance) |
|
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
|
Compressor prices US$/unit* |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
|
Average foam density kg/m3* |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
Other (please specify) |
|
|
|
|
Explanations, if needed: |
|||
*Where applicable
5.4 Approved and actual incremental operating costs: (To be filled only
upon specific request by the Multilateral Fund Secretariat)
|
|
As per project document approved |
Based on information from company |
|
|
Item |
Before |
After |
Actual |
|
Number of units produced (annually) |
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
Incremental unit costs US$/unit* |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
|
IOC/Year |
$ 0 |
$ 0 |
$ 0 |
|
Duration (years) |
0 |
|
0 |
|
Total IOC, NPV |
$ 0 |
$ 0 |
$ 0 |
|
Explanations, if needed: |
|||
*Present the calculation of the actual incremental unit cost
in the box below or attach it.
5.5 Counterpart funding of additional items not
included in the project document (based on information provided by the
company/beneficiary):
|
|
Items |
Actual expenditures |
|
1. |
|
|
|
2. |
|
|
|
3. |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Explanations, if needed: |
||
SECTION 6:
IMPLEMENTATION EFFICIENCY
|
Project
milestones |
Planned dates |
Planned duration in months** |
Actual date |
Actual duration in months** |
Delay in months |
|
ExCom approval date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Start-up of project
activities at country level as stated by Article 5 Party concerned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant agreement submitted
to beneficiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant agreement
signature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bids prepared and
requested |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contracts awarded |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment delivered |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioning and
trial runs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Start of ODS-free
production |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decommissioning and/or
destruction of redundant baseline equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total duration until
project completion* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Submission of project
completion report |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Explanations, if needed: |
|||||
*Completion of project
refers to when ODS-free production starts and equipment has been destroyed per
ExCom Decision 28/2(a).
**The number of months taken to complete item by item
SECTION 7:
FATE OF ODS-BASED PRODUCTION EQUIPMENT
|
List of equipment rendered unusable (the baseline)* |
Implemented |
||||
|
Type of equipment |
Description/ specification** |
Disposal type*** |
Date of disposal |
Implemented by: |
Certified by****: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Explanations, if needed,
particularly in case funds approved for retrofitting have subsequently been
used to replace equipment rather than to retrofit it: |
|||||
*List of equipment to be rendered
unusable or to be modified according to the project document
**Description/specification should
include model and serial numbers
***Type of equipment disposal
****Attach copy of certificate
(UNEP/OzL.Pro/ExCom/30/41, Decision 30/8, para. 25).
(UNEP/OzL.Pro/ExCom/32/44, Decision 32/18, para. 29).
(Supporting document: UNEP/OzL.Pro/ExCom/30/7).
(Supporting
document: UNEP/OzL.Pro/ExCom/32/19, Corr.1
and Add.1).
|