Qualitative performance indicators

The Forty-sixth Meeting of the Executive Committee decided:

(a) to note the evaluation of the Implementing Agencies’ performance against their 2004 business plans contained in document UNEP/OzL.Pro/ExCom/46/16 and to take note of document UNEP/OzL.Pro/ExCom/46/17 on qualitative performance indicators and the feasibility and desirability of extending current performance indicators to bilateral agencies;

(b) to amend the questionnaire on qualitative performance indicators, attached as Annex V.5 to the present report, by inserting an additional column and giving National Ozone Units the choice of awarding a rating of 1 to 4 (with 1 being the lowest mark and 4 being the highest);

(c) to invite Executive Committee members to submit to the Secretariat, by 30 September 2005, their views and comments on the current performance indicators, including suggestions for modifying the quantitative performance indicator weightings and also propose amendments to the qualitative performance indicators as input for the discussion paper on the progress of Implementing Agencies with regard to multi-year agreements (decision 46/8) for consideration at the 47th Meeting, and to permit consideration of whether to make them applicable to bilateral agencies.

(UNEP/OzL.Pro/ExCom/46/47, Decision 46/14, para. 75).

(Supporting document: UNEP/OzL.Pro/ExCom/46/17).

The Forty-seventh Meeting of the Executive Committee decided:

(a) to take note of the document on performance indicators (follow-up to decision 46/14) (UNEP/OzL.Pro/ExCom/47/55);

(b) to adopt the revised weightings for quantitative performance indicators to apply as of the 2005 evaluation of the performance of multilateral implementing agencies, as follows:

(c) Not to require bilateral implementing agencies to set targets for performance indicators.

(UNEP/OzL.Pro/ExCom/47/61, Decision 47/51 para. 191).

(Supporting document: UNEP/OzL.Pro/ExCom/47/55).