|
Part A: Assessment of Quantitative Project Performance Data |
|
Category |
Criteria |
Range |
Rating |
|
Pre-conditions for Completion* |
ODS phase-out as approved |
0 or 20 |
|
|
Conversion completed (no more CFC in use, ODS-free production has started) |
0 or 20 |
|
|
Certified equipment destruction |
0 or 20 |
|
|
Delays |
On time |
15 |
|
|
6 to 12 months delay |
0 |
|
More than 12 months delay |
-15 |
|
Cost-effectiveness of MLF Funding |
Better than approved by 5% or more |
5 |
|
|
As approved, or better by up to 5% |
0 |
|
Less cost-effective than approved |
-5 |
|
Subtotal A |
|
|
|
|
Part B: Qualitative Rating of Project Performance** |
|
Project Preparation |
Quality of project design |
5, 3 or 1 |
|
|
Technology Choice |
Conversion technology |
5, 3 or 1 |
|
|
Type of equipment |
5, 3 or 1 |
|
|
Supplier |
5, 3 or 1 |
|
|
Management of Risks |
Safety / health protection |
5, 3 or 1 |
|
|
Maintenance of equipment |
5, 3 or 1 |
|
|
Maintaining product quality |
5, 3 or 1 |
|
|
Preventing return to ODS use |
5, 3 or 1 |
|
|
Subtotal B |
|
|
|
|
Total Score |
Highly satisfactory
Satisfactory
Less satisfactory |
100 to 120
75 to 99
48 to 74 |
|
* The overall rating will be calculated only if the pre-conditions for completion, as defined by the Executive Committee in Decision 28/2, are met and documented (applicable for projects completed after July 1999).
